The liberal journal National Catholic Reporter hit the nail
on the head with a recent editorial entitled "Conservatives
dissent, but with a spin." (January 31, 2003) The editorial
observes that "conservative commentator George Weigel recently
opined that the Roman Catholic just war tradition of moral analysis
‘lives more vigorously … at the higher levels of the
Pentagon than … in certain offices at the United States
Conference of Catholic Bishops.’" But NCR rightly notes
that Wiegel is being less than honest in his targeting of criticism,
for it is not the U.S. bishops, but the Pope who is leading Catholic
opposition to the Iraqi war. As NCR states: "The real outcry
in the Catholic world is coming from across the Atlantic Ocean,
and more precisely from the subject of Weigel’s 1999 biography
Witness to Hope — Pope John Paul II. If Weigel should be
picking on anyone, it’s the pope."
Quite so. As NCR points out: "On Christmas Day, the pope
pleaded with world leaders to ‘extinguish the ominous smoldering
of a conflict which, with the joint efforts of all, can be avoided.’
On New Years Day, John Paul asserted that "peace is possible
and a duty…’" And on January 13, the Pope declared
in an address to the diplomatic corps accredited to the Vatican:
"What are we to say of the threat of a war that could strike
the people of Iraq … a people already sorely tried by more
than 12 years of embargo? War is never just when there is another
means … for settling differences between nations."
NCR asks" "So why doesn’t Weigel fight the real
enemy?" and then answers its own question: "For the
obvious reason that a certain class of conservative commentators
in today’s American Catholic church make their living by
interpreting the mind of John Paul, and it is inconvenient when
his thinking cuts against the geopolitical agenda of the Bush
administration… As for the pope, the challenge is to spin
away inconvenient utterances. Thus when American Catholic pundit
Michael Novak arrives in Rome in early February to try to convince
the Vatican of the morality of ‘preventive war,’ he
will no doubt quote John Paul II approvingly, even if his aim
is to draw different conclusions about the use of force in Iraq."
Bull’s-eye! While pretending to be loyal followers of
the Pope, neo-Catholic pundits are actually dissenting from his
opposition to the war in Iraq. That is simple hypocrisy. NCR is
thus dead-on when it concludes: "[T]he Bush-friendly line
being toed by Weigel and Novak, in open contrast to what we’re
hearing from Rome, reminds us that there is a ‘culture of
dissent’ on the right in American Catholicism too. Usually
it arises when John Paul challenges America’s prerogatives
in commerce or war…. [W]hen Catholics, especially those
in the public eye, draw conclusions at odds with the Holy Father,
sincerity would seem to require naming this for what it is—dissent
from non-infallible papal statements…."
Now, when traditionalists dissent from various novelties in
the Church that have caused Her manifest harm over the past forty
years, they at least have the honesty to state that they are doing
so, based on the pronouncements of all the Popes and Councils
before Vatican II, who would have viewed these novelties with
utter horror. That is, when traditionalists demur from the prevailing
novelties, they rely on the teaching of the Church Herself. But
the neo-Catholics who are beating the drums for war are dissenting
from this Pope based on the teaching of…. George Bush!
I am standing with the Holy Father on this one, for his opposition
to the war in Iraq is rooted in the Church’s perennial teaching
on the just war. But true loyalty to the Pope requires me to say
also, with all due respect, that the Pope would not be pleading
to avert the war with Iraq had he simply followed Our Lady’s
prescription for peace at Fatima. May God move him to do so soon,
before the annihilation of nations is upon us.
www.fatimaperspectives.com